Execution artifact 06 of 12 · canonical dosing-threshold proof

Unauthorized dosing thresholdstopped execution.

A executor possessed valid delegated authority when the dosing change route began. That authority was exceeded before commitment. TA-14 preserved the change, invalidated dependent gates, committed ESCALATE, blocked the unauthorized dosing invocation, and closed the outcome with zero dosing changes executed.

TA14-EA-000007Route 1.0.0Earliest failure: BINDING / VERSION CONTINUITYVerification level: 6Controlled demonstration

Dosing gates24

Passed23

Failed1

Evidence records8

Execution receiptPreserved

Public verificationLevel 6

Public inspection

Understand the bounded event in sixty seconds.

This view answers what was proposed, what governed it, why the decision occurred, whether the decision changed the action path, and what outcome followed.

Proposed consequence

Deploy dosing profile 12% to the treatment decision environment with create, update, and delete privileges.

The route required current dosing change evidence, a frozen target environment destination, valid authority, preserved continuity, an exact dosing manifest, and a final pre-execution revalidation.

Controlling condition

Authorized scope changed before commit.

The initial delegation was real but no longer current. The violation event occurred before the route fixed its determination, so the earlier approval could not carry forward into execution.

What this proves

The architecture failed closed on dosing-threshold mismatch.

TA-14 did not treat an earlier valid approval as permanent permission. It preserved the changed version state, reran dependent gates, committed ESCALATE, and produced a technical non-release receipt.

What this does not prove

No universal or treatment certification is claimed.

This controlled demonstration proves one bounded event through the TA-14 reference engine and adapter. It does not certify every organization, dosing change rail, authority system, or future execution.

Artifact identity

TA14-EA-000007

Release position02 of 12

DeterminationESCALATE

Earliest failureBINDING / VERSION

RouteTA14-ROUTE-WATER-DOSING-THRESHOLD-ESCALATE-007

Route version1.0.0

StatusPUBLISHED DEMONSTRATION

Repair condition

A new bounded authorization is required.

Create a new authorization that explicitly covers the requested scope, preserve it as a new record, rerun every dependent gate, and generate a new commit. The original ESCALATE remains immutable.

Record the chief water-quality officer’s named determination and authority source.

Fix the exact approved adjustment percentage, duration, affected train, and operating limits.

Bind the approval to the current influent measurements, jar-test result, and immutable request hash.

Define the execution window and perform immediate pre-dosing revalidation.

Preserve rollback instructions, monitoring thresholds, and accountable intervention authority.

Run the complete route as a new event; never overwrite this escalation.

Download package

Inspect offline.

Download public representations generated from this bounded demonstration record.

Claims boundary

Controlled demonstration.

This artifact proves one reference-engine event in which an out-of-scope dosing invocation produced a technical escalation and a preserved zero-mutation outcome. It does not claim external certification or universal performance.

This is the executable artifact itself.

This surface is generated from the frozen specification through the TA-14 eight-stage execution harness. Inspect the predicates, trace, receipt, manifest, cryptographic root and source code below.

Determination

ESCALATE

Terminal stage

BINDING

Route

TA14-ROUTE-007

Executed at

2026-08-23T21:00:00.000Z

1. Frozen specification / input

{ "schemaVersion": "ta14.execution-spec.v1", "artifactId": "TA14-EA-000007", "routeId": "TA14-ROUTE-007", "title": "Authorized threshold exceeded", "frozenAt": "2026-08-23T20:44:00.000Z", "input": { "testVector": "TA-14 founding execution-artifact corpus", "case": 7, "synthetic": true }, "predicates": [ { "id": "EA7-REALITY-STANDING", "stage": "REALITY", "description": "Required reality standing is present in the frozen test vector.", "required": true, "observed": true, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.REALITY-STANDING" }, { "id": "EA7-RECORD-STANDING", "stage": "RECORD", "description": "Required record standing is present in the frozen test vector.", "required": true, "observed": true, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.RECORD-STANDING" }, { "id": "EA7-CONTINUITY-STANDING", "stage": "CONTINUITY", "description": "Required continuity standing is present in the frozen test vector.", "required": true, "observed": true, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.CONTINUITY-STANDING" }, { "id": "EA7-ADMISSIBILITY-STANDING", "stage": "ADMISSIBILITY", "description": "Required admissibility standing is present in the frozen test vector.", "required": true, "observed": true, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.ADMISSIBILITY-STANDING" }, { "id": "EA7-DELEGATED-THRESHOLD", "stage": "BINDING", "description": "The requested consequence remains within the initiating actor's delegated quantitative threshold.", "required": true, "observed": false, "failureDetermination": "ESCALATE", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.DELEGATED-THRESHOLD" }, { "id": "EA7-COMMIT-DOWNSTREAM", "stage": "COMMIT", "description": "Downstream commit standing is evaluated only after prior-stage progression.", "required": true, "observed": null, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.COMMIT-DOWNSTREAM" }, { "id": "EA7-EXECUTION-DOWNSTREAM", "stage": "EXECUTION", "description": "Downstream execution standing is evaluated only after prior-stage progression.", "required": true, "observed": null, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.EXECUTION-DOWNSTREAM" }, { "id": "EA7-OUTCOME-DOWNSTREAM", "stage": "OUTCOME", "description": "Downstream outcome standing is evaluated only after prior-stage progression.", "required": true, "observed": null, "failureDetermination": "HOLD", "evidenceRef": "specification.json#predicates.OUTCOME-DOWNSTREAM" } ], "expectedDetermination": "ESCALATE", "claimsBoundary": "Demonstrates threshold-limited authority and escalation; does not decide whether a higher authority should approve the larger consequence." }

2. Executed eight-stage trace

01REALITYPASSAll required predicates at this stage have standing.

02RECORDPASSAll required predicates at this stage have standing.

03CONTINUITYPASSAll required predicates at this stage have standing.

04ADMISSIBILITYPASSAll required predicates at this stage have standing.

05BINDINGESCALATERequired predicate standing failed at BINDING; governed determination is ESCALATE.

06COMMITNOT_REACHEDPrior governed determination prevented progression.

07EXECUTIONNOT_REACHEDPrior governed determination prevented progression.

08OUTCOMENOT_REACHEDPrior governed determination prevented progression.

3. Machine-generated execution receipt

{ "schemaVersion": "ta14.execution-receipt.v1", "artifactId": "TA14-EA-000007", "routeId": "TA14-ROUTE-007", "specificationHash": "sha256:9f4a7f599feb838bf8b55d0937202c088d29adac8fc310d84f6ff400ba8cdc21", "determination": "ESCALATE", "terminalStage": "BINDING", "traceHash": "sha256:892653b6bb93ab9636fc6cbf949ec057e6ecca57d967790e8ed291f13dcdeb76", "executedAt": "2026-08-23T21:00:00.000Z" }

4. Evidence manifest

[ { "name": "specification.json", "sha256": "sha256:9f4a7f599feb838bf8b55d0937202c088d29adac8fc310d84f6ff400ba8cdc21" }, { "name": "trace.json", "sha256": "sha256:892653b6bb93ab9636fc6cbf949ec057e6ecca57d967790e8ed291f13dcdeb76" }, { "name": "receipt.json", "sha256": "sha256:5e28dabc36a564407a4ad39c75afd8a69462ead87536269731fd8616615b2531" } ]

5. Cryptographic package root

sha256:95277fe230852b5d8036681cbf71031d19b12b5ca7d6838a6575547dd41246f2

6. Source code and reproduction

CLAIMS BOUNDARY

Demonstrates threshold-limited authority and escalation; does not decide whether a higher authority should approve the larger consequence.