HOW MANY AI SYSTEMS ARE ACTUALLY IN SCOPE?
Cost starts with portfolio size. Each real system can carry its own identity, intended purpose, actor role, classification, evidence, change history and revalidation burden.
There is no honest universal compliance price because the work changes with the AI system, operator role, risk route, portfolio size and evidence burden. TA-14 separates the question into free classification, transparent operating access, and independent governed review when human examination is actually needed.
The Regulation creates different obligations for different actors, system classes and use contexts. Cost should therefore be estimated from the applicable obligation set—not from a generic promise that every AI system needs the same compliance program.
Start with the actual system, role, use case and evidence boundary. The same regulation can produce different obligations for different actors and systems.
Cost starts with portfolio size. Each real system can carry its own identity, intended purpose, actor role, classification, evidence, change history and revalidation burden.
Provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorised representative and GPAI-provider pathways do not create identical work. Establish role before estimating the operating burden.
Classification is not the whole cost. Evidence upkeep, logs, documentation, incidents, post-market activity, human oversight and material-change revalidation can create continuing work.
Software does not eliminate legal advice, notified-body work, conformity assessment or other independent professional costs when those are applicable. Budget those separately from the operating workspace.
The goal is not merely to reach an answer. It is to preserve what facts, evidence, scope and limitations supported that answer at that time.
Establish the actual AI system, intended purpose, EU exposure and likely operator role first. A low-cost operating path should begin with scope rather than fear.
TA-14 publishes a direct ladder: Evidence Passport $19/month, Compliance Workspace $49/month, Governance Pro $99/month and Institution $499/month.
When an organization wants a governed human readiness examination, TA-14 treats that as a separate service beginning at $750 rather than disguising professional review inside a software subscription.
New systems, model swaps, changed purposes, new jurisdictions, authority changes and evidence gaps can change both the governance burden and the appropriate operating tier.
Choose the smallest operating tier that fits the portfolio today. Upgrade when system count, team size or governance scope actually requires it.
Keep a living system-level evidence record with obligations, gaps, versions and revalidation state.
START EVIDENCE PASSPORT →Coordinate evidence, owners, documentation, incidents and team compliance work in one governed workspace.
START COMPLIANCE WORKSPACE →Operate broader high-risk, GPAI, FRIA, post-market and material-change governance across a growing portfolio.
START GOVERNANCE PRO →Run institutional governance with expanded users, authority workflows, examiner rooms and portfolio reporting.
START INSTITUTION →Use the free classifier to establish the system, intended purpose, possible actor role, EU exposure and unresolved facts. When continuing evidence infrastructure is needed, paid access begins at $19 per month. Independent human readiness review remains a separate service.
Current monthly operating tiers are $19 for Evidence Passport, $49 for Compliance Workspace, $99 for Governance Pro and $499 for Institution. Annual billing is also available through the Exchange.
No. Evidence Passport is operating evidence infrastructure. Subscription access does not create legal advice, certification, CE marking, regulatory approval, conformity assessment or an automatic favorable governance determination.
A fixed-scope independent governed readiness review begins at $750. It is separate from the software subscription because examination and operating infrastructure are different functions.
Internal staff time, evidence creation, engineering changes, legal advice, training, conformity work, external assessment and continuing monitoring can all sit outside the software license. The correct total depends on the actual system and obligations.
Not automatically. TA-14 is designed to let an organization start with the smallest tier that fits the current system count and governance need, then upgrade when scope actually grows.
Yes. The free classifier is intended to establish the initial system, purpose, role, exposure and unresolved facts before the organization decides what continuing operating infrastructure it needs.
TA-14 Exchange Activity
Live cumulative activity recorded across the public Exchange surface.
···
Visitors
Recorded public visitors
···
Page Views
Recorded Exchange views