Education AI can determine who gets admitted, how students are placed, how learning outcomes are evaluated, what level of education they can access, and whether they are flagged during tests. Annex III treats these specified uses as high-risk, while Article 5 separately prohibits emotion inference in education institutions except for medical or safety reasons.
The Regulation classifies specified AI used for admission, placement, learning-outcome assessment, education-level decisions and test-behaviour monitoring as high-risk. Article 5 separately prohibits emotion inference in education institutions except for medical or safety reasons. Current Commission guidance places Annex III education high-risk rules on the 2 December 2027 timeline.
Start with the actual system, role, use case and evidence boundary. The same regulation can produce different obligations for different actors and systems.
Annex III treats specified AI used to determine access or admission to education and vocational training institutions or programmes, or to assign people to those institutions or programmes, as high-risk.
Systems used to evaluate learning outcomes, assess the appropriate level of education for an individual, or materially influence the level of education or training a person receives or can access are also listed as high-risk.
Annex III includes AI used to monitor and detect prohibited behaviour of students during tests. That can include consequential proctoring or test-monitoring functions where the system materially affects academic outcomes.
Article 5 prohibits AI used to infer emotions of natural persons in education institutions, except where the system is intended for medical or safety reasons. A prohibited use cannot be made permissible merely by adding high-risk controls.
The goal is not merely to reach an answer. It is to preserve what facts, evidence, scope and limitations supported that answer at that time.
Separate admissions, programme placement, learning-outcome assessment, education-level determination, tutoring, scheduling, proctoring, misconduct detection and purely administrative support. Different functions can create different legal routes.
If the system infers emotions in an education institution, assess the Article 5 prohibition first. Do not treat prohibited emotion inference as an ordinary Annex III deployment unless a valid medical or safety exception applies.
Connect source data, system output, grading or placement logic, human reviewer, decision authority, override, notice, challenge or appeal pathway, logs, performance and bias evidence, and the resulting education outcome.
A new model, changed grading rubric, admissions criterion, proctoring feature, new data source, broader automation or removed human checkpoint can make the previous classification and evidence stale.
Choose the smallest operating tier that fits the portfolio today. Upgrade when system count, team size or governance scope actually requires it.
Keep a living system-level evidence record with obligations, gaps, versions and revalidation state.
START EVIDENCE PASSPORT →Coordinate evidence, owners, documentation, incidents and team compliance work in one governed workspace.
START COMPLIANCE WORKSPACE →Operate broader high-risk, GPAI, FRIA, post-market and material-change governance across a growing portfolio.
START GOVERNANCE PRO →Run institutional governance with expanded users, authority workflows, examiner rooms and portfolio reporting.
START INSTITUTION →Use the free classifier to establish the system, intended purpose, possible actor role, EU exposure and unresolved facts. When continuing evidence infrastructure is needed, paid access begins at $19 per month. Independent human readiness review remains a separate service.
Certain systems are. Annex III includes AI used to determine access or admission to education and vocational training institutions or programmes and to assign people to those institutions or programmes.
It can be. Annex III includes AI used to evaluate learning outcomes, assess the appropriate level of education for an individual, or materially influence the level of education or training a person receives or can access.
Annex III includes AI used to monitor and detect prohibited behaviour of students during tests. The exact technical function and degree of influence still matter, but consequential test-monitoring systems can fall directly within the high-risk route.
Article 5 prohibits emotion inference in education institutions, except where the system is intended for medical or safety reasons. That prohibition applies separately from Annex III high-risk rules.
Current European Commission guidance states that rules for Annex III education systems apply from 2 December 2027.
Preserve system identity and version, intended purpose, provider and deployer roles, student or programme scope, input data, scoring or placement outputs, human review, overrides, notices, logs, performance and bias evidence, appeals or challenges, material changes and revalidation history.
No. TA-14 can preserve the classification basis, prohibited-practice analysis, evidence, human-oversight state, gaps, decision history and revalidation record. It does not provide legal advice, certification, conformity assessment or regulatory approval.
TA-14 Exchange Activity
Live cumulative activity recorded across the public Exchange surface.
···
Visitors
Recorded public visitors
···
Page Views
Recorded Exchange views